Summability of Power Series Solutions of q-Difference
Equations
Changgui Zhang
Université de La Rochelle
Algorithms Seminar
January 19, 1998
[summary by Michèle Loday-Richaud]
A properly typeset version of this document is available in
postscript and in
pdf.
If some fonts do not look right on your screen, this might be
fixed by configuring your browser (see the documentation here).
The C-algebra C { x } [ sq ] of
(linear analytic) q-difference operators
is the algebra
of polynomials in
sq where sq x = qxsq and where
the coefficients are taken in the algebra C { x }
of convergent power series at x=0 in C. The elementary
operator sq acts on x by multiplication by the number q
and we make it act on functions of x by sqf(x) = f(qx).
The theory is very different depending on whether | q| is
smaller, equal or greater than 1. We deal here with the
case when |
q|>1 and, for simplicity, we assume that q is a real number.
Like differential equations, q-difference equations may have
divergent power series solutions and the aim is to develop a
theory of summability for such series like it has been done by
Martinet-Ramis and Écalle for solutions of differential equations.
A theory of summability means having a rule to change in a unique
well-defined way a series solution into an actual solution.
The similarity with differential equations is very strong. However new
concepts had to be developed and new phenomena occur.
1 Jacobi equation
The simplest non trivial example is given by the Theta series
solution of the Jacobi q-difference equation
x y(qx) - y(x) = -1. (J)
The Q series can be viewed as an analog of the Euler series
solution of the Euler equation
x2 y'+y = x.
The function
solution of the
homogeneous q-difference equation x y(qx) - y(x) = 0, is the analog
of the exponential function exp(1/x),
solution of the homogeneous differential equation x2
y'+y = 0 and it plays with respect to (J) a like role.
Notice however that the series Q is more divergent than the
series solutions of linear differential equations which are known to
be of Gevrey type.
Letting
changes
(J) into the equation and, letting then x=qt and
u(t) = z(x), into the equation
u(t+1) - u(t) = -
q |
|
. (D) |
This latter equation is a linear difference
equation the second member of which has an essential singularity at infinity.
However the Fourier method can be used to solve it as follows.
Denote by
F(u(t))(t) = |
|
ó õ |
|
u(t) e |
|
dt and
F |
-1(j(t))(t) =
|
ó õ |
|
j(t) e |
|
dt |
the Fourier and the inverse Fourier transform.
Assume that a solution u(t) of (D) is left invariant by
successive application of F and F-1. Using
the identity
F(u(t+1))(t) = e t F(u(t))(t)
we get
and then solutions of (D) in the form
There correspond the following solutions of (J) defined on all of
the Riemann surface of log:
the integral being taken on the half line dq starting from 0 to
infinity
with angular direction q = qq log q
provided that q¹ 0 mod 2p.
When q varies between two successive forbidden values
2kp and 2(k+1)p the corresponding yq(x) are equal.
When q is taken in different such intervals they are equal up to a
multiplicative q-constant (a q-constant is a constant in the
algebra
C { x } [ sq ], i.e., a function
C(x) satisfying C(qx) = C(x)). Thus we can concentrate on one
of
them. We choose q Î ] 0, 2p[ and denote by
f0 the
corresponding yq solution.
Such a solution can be taken as a model for q-sums of
q-Borel-Laplace summable series.
We emphasize its main property.
Writing, for all x ¹ 1, the identity 1/(1-x) = åm=0n-1xm + xn/(1-x)
yields the equality
f0(x) = |
|
qm(m-1)/2 xm +
|
|
|
ó õ |
|
q |
|
|
dx
|
and then the inequality
|
f0(x) - |
|
qm(m-1)/2 xm |
|
£
C |
|
q |
|
| x|n
|
where Cq is the constant Cq = max (1, 1/| sinq|) and
argq = 1/log qarg.
Note that the constant Cq is locally uniform in q.
Such a condition can be taken as a model for f0 to be the q-sum of
level 1 of its Taylor series
åm³ 0 qm(m-1)/2 xm.
We will see that, in all generality, q-Borel-Laplace summable series
and q-summable series of level 1 are the same series.
2 q-Borel-Laplace summability or q-summability of level 1
Translating the Fourier and inverse Fourier transforms in terms of
the variables x = qt and x= qt
yields the q-Borel and q-Laplace transforms
where r>0 is chosen small enough for f(x) to exist.
The formal analog of Bq is given by
Definition 1 A series ån³ 0anxn is a
q-Borel-Laplace summable series for the direction
q if it can be applied a q-Borel and q-Laplace transform
relative to the direction q and close directions.
The Theta series is the typical example of a q-Borel-Laplace summable
series.
Definition 2
-
A series ån³ 0anxn is
of q-Gevrey type (of level 1) if it satisfies a growth
condition
| an | £ K qn(n-1)/2 An for all n
and suitable constants K and A.
- A function f is q-asymptotic of level
1 to a series f^(x) = ån³ 0anxn for the direction q if,
for suitable constants Kq >0 and Aq >0, the
inequality
|
f(x) - |
|
amxm |
|
£ K |
|
q |
|
A |
|
| x| n
(* |
|
)
|
holds for all n and small enough x on the Riemann surface of
Log.
The Jacobi function f0 is q-asymptotic to the Theta series
for all directions but the directions q = 0 mod 2p.
A q-asymptotic expansion is also an asymptotic expansion in the usual
Poincaré sense. Hence, if it exists, it is unique and can be called
the Taylor series of the function.
There exist
q-flat functions. However one has
the following result.
Proposition 1 The unique function to be q-flat in two different directions is
the null function.
Definition 3 A series f^(x) = ån³ 0anxn is said q-summable of level 1
with q-sum
f for the direction q if the
condition (*q) holds locally uniformly with respect to
q, i.e., if there exist a neighbourhood
(q-e, q+e) of q and constants
K and A such that
|
f(x) - |
|
amxm |
|
£ K
q |
|
An | x| n
(** |
|
)
|
for all n, all q~Î (q-e, q+e)
and all small enough x.
It results from Proposition 1 that the q-sum of level 1 of f^ if it exists for the direction q is unique.
Theorem 1 A series is q-summable of level 1 for the direction
q if and only if it is q-Borel-Laplace summable in the
direction q and the sums are equal.
Definition 4 A series f^(x) = å anxn is
said q-summable of level 1 (or q-Borel-Laplace summable) if it is
q-summable of level 1 for all directions but locally finitely many
which are called singular directions.
The series Theta is q-summable of level 1 with singular directions
q = 0 mod 2p.
One can extend the previous notions to any level k
by substituting xk to x or so.
3 Summability of series solutions of q-difference equations
Using the elementary operator sq instead of the derivation
d/dx one can define the Newton polygon of
a linear q-difference operator like it can be done for a linear differential
operator.
A fundamental set of formal solutions was given by Adams in [1].
It is made of finite linear combinations of terms of the form
|
(x) x |
|
log |
mx e |
|
where aÎ C, mÎ N, µÎ Q |
and where
f^ (x) is a power series (possibly in a fractional power of
x).
The numbers µ are the different slopes of the Newton polygon
N(D). It was proved by Carmichael [2] that
when N(D) has the unique slope 0 then there are no
exponential terms and all the power series are convergent. The
origin 0 is then
either an ordinary or a regular singular point.
When there is the slope 0 and a non zero slope then the origin 0 is an
irregular singular point; the number of solutions without an
exponential factor is equal to the length of the zero slope. Those
solutions we will call the formal series solutions even though they can
contain a factor xalogm x.
Theorem 2 Suppose that the Newton polygon N(D) of a linear
q-difference operator D admits a unique non zero slope equal
to k. Then, the formal series solutions of D are
q-summable of level k.
Following the same kind of idea one can also define q-accelerators like it
was done by J. Écalle for differential and difference equations and
introduce a notion of q-accelero-summability, also called
q-multisummability for finitely many levels µ1, ..., µp.
Theorem 3 Suppose that the Newton polygon N(D) of a linear
q-difference operator D admits the non zero slopes
µ1, ..., µp. Then, the formal series solutions of D are
q-multisummable of levels (µ1, ..., µp).
Proposition 2 q-summable series of level k are naturally given a
structure of C{x}-module, not a structure of algebra.
For example, if f^ is a non convergent q-summable series of
level 1 then f^2 is not q-summable of any level k;
however it is q-multisummable of levels (1,2).
References
- [1]
-
Adams (C. R.). --
Linear q-difference equations. Bulletin of the American
Mathematical Society, 1931, pp. 361--382.
- [2]
-
Carmichael (R. D.). --
The general theory of q-difference equations. American Journal
of Mathematics, vol. 34, 1912, pp. 146--168.
- [3]
-
Zhang (Changgui). --
Les développements asymptotiques q-gevrey, les séries
Gq-sommables et leurs applications. Annales de l'Institut Fourier,
1998. --
To appear.
This document was translated from LATEX by
HEVEA.